Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Bill_Dimm 4314 days ago
The problem I have with that argument is that the original post said there were multiple payments that were all reversed later. If the code was so bad, why wasn't the developer terminated much earlier? Doesn't multiple payments normally imply that multiple milestones were hit (i.e. deliverables accepted)?
1 comments

This could be an attempt to get a running proof of concept and then trying to minimize the cost of that proof of concept after the fact. It would be curious how much the investors knew about these events.