|
|
|
|
|
|
by mikeash
4321 days ago
|
|
|
The people who actually own the airplane you're in will tell you to stop doing that, and will deny you use of their property if you refuse to comply. Those same people intentionally paid for a seat reclining function with the intention that passengers use it. This is constantly framed as an issue between passengers, but it's not. It's an issue between passengers and the airline. Their equipment, their (and the government's) rules. |
|
|
Not quite. They paid for a seat reclining function hoping to lure punters into paying for a ticket. I'm not sure they care whether anybody can actually use the seat functions further than that.
> This is constantly framed as an issue between passengers, but it's not. It's an issue between passengers and the airline.
Absolutely this. Getting customers arguing over the details of property rights they almost certainly don't have is a truly wonderful reframe.