|
|
|
|
|
by bduerst
4307 days ago
|
|
No they didn't. They narrowly defined a word that has many definitions while demonstrating outrage at any other meaning. While they are technically correct in a textbook sense, their idea of a "True" free market has never existed in the context of this conversation, and it can be argued that price collusion between suppliers for a market is the natural result of free markets. |
|