|
|
|
|
|
by jrochkind1
4311 days ago
|
|
> and has been completely stable for a year or more If this is true, why are the releases still labelled 'dev' releases? How is anyone supposed to know that it's actually a stable release they should be using? Research it on HN comment threads? |
|
Because it's an arbitrary label.
Or because John wants to hook something additional up or polish something before giving it his "3.0" blessing.
Or because it crashes on Linux and needs to fix that too...
But not because there's any issue with it on OS X, at least not for me, and I'm a heavy (8-10 hours per day) user.