|
|
|
|
|
by wukix
4312 days ago
|
|
Nitpick: It's not licensing for a language, it's licensing for a specific tool. Common Lisp itself is not proprietary (having a standard) and code can be portable across implementations. To answer your question, I would say that the business model (of charging for licenses) is fine in principle, but developer tools is a very difficult business to be in. |
|