[morenoh149]

pricing compared to s3: assuming 5,000 photos ~5gb of data. $0.15 for storage 40gb of outgoing traffic is $4.80 So you're basically paying double the s3 prices for convenience. This service also does image manipulation and cdn integration. So you should also calculate your expected cost of using ec2 and a cdn. (BTW not ripping on the op. I like the service and was genuinely calculating the costs for my own use case).

[everettForth]

Assuming you perfectly use the maximum capacity, at which point, the service is probably useless because no one can upload new photos.

It's super easy to do this if you're already running your website on ec2, and S3 for a few hundred photos will cost you less than a dollar per month.

Is this for Heroku users because running a single dyno to resize images costs $30 / month?

[egonschiele]

If it is purely image hosting, that is expensive. But if it does image resizing on the fly, I'd say it's worth it.