Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by stickperson 4318 days ago
Don't airline companies really frown upon this practice? I can't recall if they can actually do something about it though.
4 comments

If you do this for a roundtrip purchase, they will cancel the remaining legs of your flight.
They certainly frown, but only if they know you're doing it. Don't lie if they ask, but no need to offer it up. You can also book without using your frequent flyer info to be safe.
If you do book with your frequent flyer number, their revenue department will revoke any rewards/mileage you have if a trend develops.
I don't understand, why does airline frown upon this practice? What do they lose from you not going to one of their flight?
Revenue!
But you have already paid for the ticket, isn't it?

The other question I'm wondering would be, how could it be possible in that case that A -> B directly would be more expensive than A -> B ->C ?

A->B->C most likely is more expensive to the airline than A->B, but cost to the airline is just one factor in determining how much the airline charges the consumer. B could be a more desirable destination than C, and so people are willing to pay more for trips to B.
Not sure - perhaps the airline is promoting that route or that route is already popular. Often the "C" segment takes you to the Caribbean or to Las Vegas. Price is not always correlated with distance flown.
If you had bought the trip you actually wanted to take, you would have paid more. Further, it would have left a seat open on the second flight which they might have sold to somebody else, making even more money still.

Of course, the second flight probably isn't 100% sold out, and you might have gone with a competitor or not taken the trip at a higher price. But they don't necessarily see that, much like music labels don't necessarily understand that every instance of piracy is not a lost sale.

I see two potential problems.

First, you probably shouldn't do this as the first part of a roundtrip ticket, as the airline can cancel your return if they think you're abusing the system. That may not be important for many people, but it's there.

Second, if something goes wrong (bad weather, can't find a pilot, whatever) the airline may reroute you through a different city, completely screwing up your plan. They don't really care where you connect, and as far as they know neither do you. If you book, say, JFK->LAX->SFO and the engine falls off your JFK->LAX plane while sitting at the gate, they might move you to a route like JFK->ORD->SFO, and saying, "but, but, I was going to leave the airport at LAX and skip my flight to SFO" is probably not going to get much sympathy from the agent.

Third,

the overhead compartments are full and you have to check your bag.

Just be first in line to board the plane.
Don't they give it back to you at the end of the flight when that happens? In my experience, only bags checked during checkin get routed through connections.
Very true, my co-founder discovered this the hard way.

A note on the roundtrip booking - correct, you should never book roundtrip. Your roundtrip should be made up from two one-way bookings.

lol I am the aforementioned co-founder. This is definitely a flight booking hack with costs and benefits that have to be weighed. I don't personally book this way for savings of just 10-20 bucks. When it's something like $80 in savings or more (I saved >30% on my last flight), you start to think maybe the expected value will come out positive, even with all risks considered.