| If it's an electronic product, the customer rightly expects it to last as long as other familiar electronic products. If it's an expensive product then the customer rightly expects it to last much longer than comparable items of lesser cost. For a naturally expensive item like a CNC mill, where many customers will purchase their first one to replace a manual mill which has worn out after a decade or two, they often expect the modern CNC unit to fully replace the older piece with no further consideration (or cost) until the same familiar mode of mechanical wear occurs in another decade or two. If your software or operating system does not live up to this expectation by design, then you are not giving the customer what they need to begin with. If an industrial solution truly solves a problem, it stays solved well enough for the operator to move on to concentrate on their core competence (or different unsolved problems) from then on, and only incur insignificant
costs or distractions from the previously unsolved problem. A payroll or other office system is not that much different, but applies to many more businesses.
Computerizing a formerly manual system, high up-front cost is expected to pay for itself in future efficiency.
If no further features are desired, then the business should be able to rely on electro-mechanical integrity as the weakest point over the following decades. Replacing individual worn-out office machines as needed in the traditional way. Only "modernizing" company-wide on their own initiative and schedule.
If you can not buy brand new machines as needed to continue your present office systems unchanged indefinitely if you want to, this does not mean there is a defect in your
approach just because you need a solved problem to stay solved. You may just be a victim of a consumer-centric (predatory) IT vendor structure even though you are paying top dollar
for business solutions which are supposed to last. |