[taftster]

I don't entirely disagree with you, I get what you're saying.

But I definitely don't see Windows as being tightly focussed nor a single predictable entity. The differences, nuances, and upgrade paths between 95, 98, ME, XP, Vista, 7, 8 are as fragmented and confusing as possible.

Linux isn't any better, this is true. But I don't buy that it's because of singular vision that Microsoft continues to dominate. Today Apple has the strongest composed experience, in my opinion. Too bad they have basically zero corporate presence.

[indlebe]

>But I definitely don't see Windows as being tightly focussed nor a single predictable entity.

This is perhaps because you know about the topic. The average user, because MS dominated most computer interactions that they've had, psychologically feels quite comfortable with it.

But I don't know if Linux is ready for the desktop yet. IMHO it's place is in the back-end.

Because Linux has more freedom it attracts developers/coders/programmers that also value freedom over vendor support. Any *nix flavor offers more hackability than MS.

And I think you'll find that the folks who use it think more freely when designing solutions as well.

[untog]

Apple has zero corporate presence because as far as I can tell, they don't really try. We tried setting up some Apple TVs at my work to use as an AirPlay target during presentations. But Bonjour can't cross subnets (or something similar), so we couldn't do it. And Apple were absolutely uninterested in providing support.

[chubs]

With the latest firmware + ios7, Airplay now works in such environments because it uses bluetooth for handshaking. Might be worth re-trying?

[dmishe]

>Too bad they have basically zero corporate presence. perhaps this is exactly why :)