I realize now it sounds as if Erlang got something wrong and Elixir got it right instead. That's not what I wanted to say.
Elixir semantics is very close to Erlang's, but it also has things beyond what Erlang can offer as easily: macros, protocols, comprehensions with any kind of enumerable as a generator.
Of course, the core facilities provided by the runtime system are left unchanged: concurrency primitives, functional semantics, distribution, error handling (Elixir has slightly different conventions, but the idea of "letting it crash" remains). And in OTP land there are quite a few additions that simply make OTP more "elixirish" (like getting a lazy stream of events from GenEvent).
Elixir semantics is very close to Erlang's, but it also has things beyond what Erlang can offer as easily: macros, protocols, comprehensions with any kind of enumerable as a generator.
Of course, the core facilities provided by the runtime system are left unchanged: concurrency primitives, functional semantics, distribution, error handling (Elixir has slightly different conventions, but the idea of "letting it crash" remains). And in OTP land there are quite a few additions that simply make OTP more "elixirish" (like getting a lazy stream of events from GenEvent).