[leigh_t]

Whoever made your site. Don't fire them, shoot them.

[nikhilpandit]

Not my site. Just found it and thought it was worth sharing.

[asperous]

Besides some text readability issues, I thought the site was perfect for what it's for.

[ZoF]

Yep.

I mean, on mobile(in particular), it is indeed awful, but I don't think it's expected or needed to be responsive(or otherwise optimized-for-mobile) at this point in the products life-cycle.

Yes there's a lot of room for improvement(as there is on every site, keep in mind web design is largely based on personal preference) the parent-poster's kind of response though is not productive.

[bellerocky]

What's wrong with this site?

[leigh_t]

I apologise for my impulsive reply. I should have better discipline (usually I don't reply at all because I know I'm pretty dickish)

This is how the site looks to me: http://s13.postimg.org/uduowd0if/sugar.png

In my opinion this is pretty terrible. We all know the importance of first impressions (case in point, people reading my initial response).

[Yardlink]

With a resolution that high you must be used to small fixed pixel width sites. Pity they can't all just be doubled or quadrupled in size.

[sp332]

The readability is really bad, and clicking an image brings me to a smaller version?