[_tfbj]

All pure speculation. They haven't even excavated yet, only outlined the walls.

They write so much in 3 different places, including literally admitting hype in the write-up: "There has been speculation that the tomb could contain the remains of Alexander the Great..."

Worse yet, this is old speculation news. Last year, nearly to the day, they (the Culture Ministry) made a similar announcement: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2401057/Have-...

This area is home to many excavation projects; google "site:.edu Amphipolis" and you'll see quite a lot of them.

[sebkomianos]

Although you are not entirely wrong, "all pure speculation" is different than "this is a speculation based on some findings, so far".

[_tfbj]

Sorry, my language is harsh because I was addressing the nature of this writeup, which I labeled as "pure speculation." I work in the news industry, so I both experience and see this side of the news industry, and I don't like it. It's the un-informed PR rewrite story.

Way it happens is a general-assignment person (who writes well but has no specific topic knowledge) gets an assignment to write a story. The story originates from a press release. The press release is political: (culture ministry is an office, tasked with promotion amongst things). Politician bypasses actual archeologists and scientists and then peppers the story with speculation designed to boost their office priorities and awareness. "By the way, this is probably Alexander's tomb. Very exciting."

The person writing the story has no training in history, archeology or is generally aware of trends, claims and excavations. No clue what an in-situ find is. They look at the PR, look-up a few background factoids, rewrite the piece and publish it. As you walk by and ask how their morning is, they casually proclaim "did you know pp, they discovered Alexander's tomb this morning???"

I cringe and walk on.

[sebkomianos]

Yup, you are not wrong. This particular newspaper (Kathimerini - "Daily" in greek) is known to be government-aligned and is basically jumping on every opportunity to make it look like more and more things are running better in the country.

It is also very much worth noting that the greek prime minister himself, Samaras, said "Please be patient for a few days - for a very important archeological discovery to be made". Alexander's tomb? "I told you so". Someone else's tomb? "This is still an important discovery, blah blah blah".

[christudor]

Some Greeks are very proud (even precious) about their cultural history. Check out this response to Dr Armand D'Angour's 'attempt to re-write Greek history' (and dont' forget to read the comments): http://eu.greekreporter.com/2014/07/23/bbc-attempts-to-rewri...

On the issue of Alexander specifically, it's important to note how important Alexander is in whole Greece/FYR Macedonia thing. Alexander was a Macedonian, of course, but what was then Macedonia is now part of Northern Greece, meaning the (modern) country of Macedonia can only be called (The Former Yugoslav Republic of) Macedonia. By 'locating' the tomb of Alexander in (modern) Greece, the Greeks further solidify their claim that Alexander is part of their cultural heritage, not (FYR) Macedonia's.

(This is interesting because when Alexander was actually alive, he did everything he could to make himself look more Greek, whereas the Greeks proper saw him as a barbarian Macedonian and wanted nothing to do with him...)

[sebkomianos]

I am greek. :D

[christudor]

Yes, as I said, it's only /some/ Greeks that feel this way. I hope I haven't misrepresented the situation too much? (Please correct me if I'm wrong!)

[autokad]

worse yet, the excavation began in the 1960s.