Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Houshalter 4328 days ago
I assume the researchers were smart enough to think of that. Don't judge a study based on a one sentence description from a journalist.
2 comments

I was commenting more on the way that the journalist portrayed the research than the research itself.

Another example: "But, however powerful the economic and social forces behind the disappearing neighbour—and however positive many of its results—according to reams of new research, the transformation is also poisoning our politics and, quite literally, killing us."

These are the kinds of articles that cause people to have an anti-science attitude. "One week coffee is good for me and the next week it causes cancer". It also makes it very difficult to address these kinds of problems because you have one side where people are running around like chicken little and another side that may actually agree that the issues is a problem but they have much more moderate solutions than the majority.

The average quality of papers from the field of psychology is abysmal. It pays to be sceptical here.