[Pacabel]

This is absurd. So rdxm is a "shill" merely because he or she pointed out some very real and important issues surrounding this sort of technology, and then also pointed out the fact that established players are best prepared to handle such challenges? Huh?

If you're going to make such accusations, or even just hint at them, please provide us with at least some real evidence to show that rdxm is being directly compensated by one or more of the industry incumbents for posting that comment. Since I doubt very much that you can provide that evidence, I think it would be appropriate for you to apologize to rdxm and to the rest of the community here.

[angersock]

Eh, I'd expect somebody shilling for Epic or any of the other major vendors to sound the same way--which is exactly what I said, no more no less. I'm not going to apologize.

The problem with bandying about "HIPPA [sic]" and random ISO security standards is that it only serves to dampen enthusiasm for fixing the staggeringly pervasive issues of mismanagement and technological obsolescence.

Anybody can come up with a "no" or a problem--"but but but HIPAAaaaaa" is a common refrain from people who want to sound like they know something but who lack the talent or skill to fix the fucking thing.

[mkal_tsr]

You sound like a shill for startups.

[angersock]

I hope so!