[cookiemonster11]

This is a bit of a stretch. Chemtrails are a baseless assumption. EM radiation has a measurable effect matter. Why not make valid points instead of insulting people?

[martiuk]

Non-Ionizing radiation means exactly that.

http://www.hpa.org.uk/webw/HPAweb&Page&HPAwebAutoListName/Pa...

[commandar]

Non-ionizing radiation can still be harmful.

That said, the power levels emitted by wifi devices are so far below any safe exposure limits that it's laughable.

[a8da6b0c91d]

Non-ionizing radiation has biological effects. Magnetic fields have biological effects. This is not controversial! Many replicated experiments prove it!

I am not going to say Wifi causes cancer because I don't know (doubt it). But this reflexive bleating about non-ionizing radiation needs to stop. Radio waves do not have to break DNA to affect biological tissues. They can alter many important chemical reactions.

[sliverstorm]

You could say the same thing about a summer breeze. They have biological effects too.

[a8da6b0c91d]

Your point being? I dare say spending most of each day out in a continuous breeze might have some noteworthy effects. Skin disease?

[sliverstorm]

Something having biological effects proves absolutely nothing.

Non-ionizing radiation has biological effects. Magnetic fields have biological effects. This is not controversial!

So?

Also, if you are worried that spending a lot of time "exposed" to a light breeze is going to give you skin disease, you might want to read about hypochondria because you have it.