|
|
|
|
|
by zimbatm
4338 days ago
|
|
I have used Ansible 6 months ago and it felt slow. The biggest issue which is intrinsic to the model is that each task is executed sequentially across all the target hosts. It makes it's behaviour easy to understand but it also makes each step as slow as the slowest host. Another issue that might be fixed now is that each task is essentially a script uploaded to the target and then executed locally. Unfortunately at the time the scripts weren't cached properly so N invocation of the same task would mean N uploads of the same script. That being said it's really simple to use and I recommend it if you don't have an existing infrastructure management system. Ansible fits in well as an orchestration tool. |
|
Please read the tuning article on the blog for sure. It's definitely not slow and we have folks updating 5000 servers in 5 minutes. (Yes, really!) ControlPersist and the like are key, and we'd be happy to help discuss options for you.
As for sequentially, set --forks to control parallelism. Steps are executed in order, but that's true of all CMS systems.