|
|
|
|
|
|
by fixerfrasse
4337 days ago
|
|
|
Well the reader would read as fast as it can. Let's say that it would read the entire image in 1/120 second, then it is waiting and does nothing another 1/120 second before it starts reading next frame. The real number would be significantly smaller. Therefore they can not bump the sample rate more then five or six times. And I imagine they are using some intelligent algorithm to evenly space out the captured samples already. |
|
|