|
|
|
|
|
by afs35mm
4331 days ago
|
|
I'm not entirely sure this is an accurate analogy. vendor prefixes solved a need. Why should we be developing to the lowest common denominator? I think we should also watch out for link-bait SEO headlines such as "Why Webkit is the New IE6 (The Trap of Vendor Prefixes)"... |
|
No. It tried to solve two different needs: proprietary stable APIs and unstable/in-flux specs. And the abuse of the latter forced browsers to drop the use-case entirely and hide features behind flags because developers could not be trusted to act responsibly, so it definitely didn't solve that problem.
> Why should we be developing to the lowest common denominator?
That's not developing to the LCD, that developers deploying half-specified and unstable APIs in production.