Sorry, it already took me too much time to watch UN press-conference in it's entirety to provide proper timed youtube links (which you've ignored) and pin-point other faults in your arguments that you also seem to ignore.
It is easy to promise that for people which don't "argue" by dismissing Wikipedia, BBC etc -- because they have posted a youtube link somewhere where they interpret what someone said as different.
That is arguably ruder.
[Edit: pipy changed opinion because of arguments in another place when he wrote crazy stuff. He is not a troll, just upset. I stand corrected.]
Well, that is almost as good a source as when you linked to a blogger. :-)
(So if I link to the criticism on Wikipedia of the Crimean election, you "disprove" that with another Youtube link? :-) )
[Thanks for another good laugh.]