Porn? No, not necessarily at all, or as I said, "safe for work or not".
Spam? No, not at all. Instead, as I said, searches people want to do and results they want to find, and those are nearly never spam.
Nothing tricky; take my description just the way I gave it.
The content types are primarily still images, recorded music, video clips, i.e., content types where search by keywords/phrases work from poor down to not at all due to far too little text in the content for matching users' keywords/phrases, and a major fraction of blogs and long tail Web sites, that is, where the content is mostly text.
A point is that search by keywords/phrases works well for only about 1/3rd of the content, searches people want to do, and results they want to find. My work is for the other 2/3rds. This description is difficult to understand?
Spam? No, not at all. Instead, as I said, searches people want to do and results they want to find, and those are nearly never spam.
Nothing tricky; take my description just the way I gave it.
The content types are primarily still images, recorded music, video clips, i.e., content types where search by keywords/phrases work from poor down to not at all due to far too little text in the content for matching users' keywords/phrases, and a major fraction of blogs and long tail Web sites, that is, where the content is mostly text.
A point is that search by keywords/phrases works well for only about 1/3rd of the content, searches people want to do, and results they want to find. My work is for the other 2/3rds. This description is difficult to understand?