Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Zikes 4343 days ago
Off-topic, but why do traditional print companies always stubbornly insist on ignoring the fundamental differences between print and web media?

All that text, and not a single link to the +Pool Kickstarter page. It doesn't even have to be in the article text itself, having it at the end would be just fine.

4 comments

That was the first Kickstarter. The most recent one (and the one described in the story regarding $300k raised, etc.), is here: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/694835844/pool-tile-by-...
It looks like the first Kickstarter was to find and test an adequate filtration system, and the second is to build a "float lab" test pool. If that succeeds they'll probably have to launch yet another Kickstarter asking for funding of over a million to build the final product.
The article says they raised $300k, but this kickstarter only says $50k. Any ideas where the discrepancy comes from?
That was the first kickstarter; they then ran a second one for the next phase of the project: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/694835844/pool-tile-by-...
The Kickstarter ended in 2011, and their web site at http://www.pluspool.org/ has options to buy tiles. It looks like they've pursued other fundraising options after Kickstarter.
Because if you click out to another web site, they might lose your eyeballs, and you would not be looking at the print media company's adverts any more.
I asked the author on twitter, maybe he'll answer. :)

https://twitter.com/mithaldu/status/494940364717842434

Turns out it's simply a direct copy of a print article, which of course doesn't have links.
Not referencing sources is bad even for classic non-hypertextual media.