Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by oh_sigh 4349 days ago
I think the implication was that people were afraid of a terrorist attack during the act, not in retrospect when they saw it was just a white flag
1 comments

That was my read as well. That 'people' were afraid it was a terrorist attack because the lights on a landmark went dark. On the other hand, why didn't people just assume it was a black-out, or technical issues?
Yeah, my first thought would have been "Dumbasses should change the lights during the day, not the night". "Terrorists must be terrorizing us by breaking our lightbulbs" would have never occurred to me; it is far more plausible that somebody was working on them.
Well, the biggest terrorist attack on American soil did happen about a mile away from there. Maybe that has something to do with it.
I considered that, and I think it might excuse "Boston mooninite" sorts of paranoia, but seeing lights turn off on a landmark and jumping to the "terrorists" conclusion? Nearly 13 years later? This wasn't a low-flying plane or an odd device with blinking lights, this was just some lightbulbs going out.
"Terrorists must be terrorizing us by breaking our lightbulbs" would have never occurred to me

Report to Oblast 37N. We have made you an appointment with the Education Corps.