[mjburgess]

No, that is exactly what it means. It doesnt take very long to look something up (eg. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnosticism ).

Agnosticism is not about being uncertain, it's the position that the answer is unknowable or unknown - which is much stronger than merely being uncertain.

[meepmorp]

You have a point, but the person you're responding to makes a more important one - the colloquial definition of agnostic, in reference to religion, is a person who's not sure what they think about the existence of gods. When you call yourself an agnostic, that's what people typically understand by it.

[mjburgess]

That's the problem with surveys like this: the categories are political not philosophical.

It would be better to ask, "Does a deity feature amongst your considerations when making a decision?"

I take it that's what people are mainly interested in anyway.

If this question was asked alongside the others in these questionnaires I think you'd see a high percentage of non-atheist responders agreeing.

[SamReidHughes]

I am not making a point about the colloquial definition. The wikipedia article he linked disagrees with him too.

[jasonkostempski]

If that's the definition then it's useless as a distinguishing label since everyone on either side of faith can't know. If anyone could know, faith and belief wouldn't be necessary.

[mjburgess]

Many atheists and theists believe you can provide evidence one way or another. Most people are not agnostic.

[SamReidHughes]

There is a difference between saying you can prove something and saying you know something. Your own Wikipedia article disagrees with you.