|
|
|
|
|
by clarry
4341 days ago
|
|
Actually I think the strongest defenders of emacs say you use C-s and the like for most navigation. Moving character-by-character is slow and inefficient, so the argument about whether C-n C-p etc. are better or worse than hjkl is irrelevant. I have my own code editor which is more like vi than emacs, but I'm using interactive search in it. |
|
That's the best line I've heard to finish an emacs-vs-vi argument!