You know, you cannot always expect evidence of the type that scientists or courts demand.
Specially when dealing with a victim of systematic injustice, you have to take their claims seriously. Not at face value, mind you, but seriously enough to get up and gather your own set of evidence to either confirm of refute the claim.
What you just wrote is a thought stopper. There is no hard evidence of discrimination, therefore there's no discrimination at all. Maybe it is that you, personally do not discriminate... but this attitude is exactly what enables the bigots amongst us to keep going with impunity.
If they wished to conceal information, why admit to bad behavior on their child's part in the first place? On hearing of the suspension of the author's child, they volunteered information about their own children, including one story of a child that caused another to be hospitalized, but was not suspended for it.
Specially when dealing with a victim of systematic injustice, you have to take their claims seriously. Not at face value, mind you, but seriously enough to get up and gather your own set of evidence to either confirm of refute the claim.
What you just wrote is a thought stopper. There is no hard evidence of discrimination, therefore there's no discrimination at all. Maybe it is that you, personally do not discriminate... but this attitude is exactly what enables the bigots amongst us to keep going with impunity.