|
|
|
|
|
|
by paulrouget
4349 days ago
|
|
|
> what the heck were they thinking? I don't know, maybe about how to design a spec that is compatible with past and future CSS parsers and features? People think it's so simple to come up with a new feature for CSS/HTML/JS, when actually, they have no idea how difficult it is. They're smarter than that: http://www.xanthir.com/blog/b4KT0 |
|
|
> what the heck were they thinking?
...At first place when they wrote CSS.
CSS is a disaster,and one of the worst spec ever written in my book.
> People think it's so simple to come up with a new feature for CSS/HTML/JS, when actually, they have no idea how difficult it is.
Aside from HTML,CSS and JS are "defacto" standards since vendors werent able to agree on a better spec when they should have. only developpers can fix these with tools they build.Devs cant rely on these technologies on their own.That's why they have CSS and JS preprocessors.Because while it's crap at the end of the day devs need to build on top of that crap.