Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by saraid216 4346 days ago
That's roughly equivalent to discovering the identity of someone on the internet who you're arguing with and using it to "win" the argument.
2 comments

Why do you think this is roughly equivalent?

It's not about knowing the identity of the person, it's knowing how they are going to proceed in arguing their case. Setting up an argument takes a lot of time, it's their strategy for winning a case / defending their client. Knowing this beforehand will put one side at an advantage in preparing their case and specifically aim at any faults in arguments.

Also why is "win" in quotes? There's generally no winners in flame wars, but in a court of law decisions are made on who wins and loses unless there's a mistrial/deals being cut by both sides. So being able to concentrate efforts directly preparing against a known strategy that the opponent is using is a big advantage.

> Also why is "win" in quotes?

Because,

> There's generally no winners in flame wars

using it to "win" the argument

Is that a euphemism for "intimidate them into shutting up"?

Yes. You haven't seen it used before?