[jacquesm]

That appears to be a quote from a UN conference.

Besides that, the article makes a couple of pretty good points. If you label every writer that ever made an error in their writings (or quotations) as having 'literally zero integrity' and then you stop reading because further consumption is pointless you'll throw out a lot of good with the bad.

For instance, I wasn't aware of the Russian Robotic Warfare program mentioned in the link gleaned from the article.

[Mithaldu]

It is not a quote. In fact it is almost the opposite. It is a sentence fragment the author tagged to the end of an actual quote; the result being, as you demonstrate, that there will be some people who believe that was actually discussed.

It is an embellishment which nobody who had done any diligent research on the matter could have come up with.

Thus the entirety of the article is suspect, and the flowery writing style does not help in extracting what might be the actual facts.