|
|
|
|
|
by hadoukenio
4350 days ago
|
|
That's a great explanation. Thanks for that. Now I'm curious about why it's so locked down at Matasano... what are the main threats to need full-disk encryption and then multiple encrypted containers per project? I should have explained my reasoning for originally choosing ecryptfs. I find it really convenient doing a backup of ecryptfs' cipher-text. Since it's simple files, an rsync will do. If I wanted to backup virtual encrypted disks, I would first have to mount source and destination to do an rsync, or painstakingly do an entire dd without the mount... maybe I'm just doing it wrong? |
|
Separate vaults are useful if you have multiple clients, say, and you are doing pen tests. While you are working on one, the others are not unlocked.