|
|
|
|
|
by nZac
4348 days ago
|
|
My concern revolves around credibility. They took a beating after Heartbleed regarding the cost of revocation for certificates/credentials affected. While that is mostly a business decision on their end– it raises concerns about what their business is about. Nothing is "free", it just might not cost currency. "If you don't pay for the service, you are the service." Since I don't have experience with them I am looking for some level of assurance that they are a legitimate service. In my opinion it is difficult to gain that assurance just from their website. |
|
In terms of "credibility", the issue comes down to how many browsers include their root cert by default. As far as I know, IE, Firefox, and Chrome include it meaning that it will be trusted by default.
The way they make money is selling other types of services such as wildcard and "green bar" certs. I think the folks running it want to see a wider use of SSL, and see providing free host-based certs as a good way to accomplish that goal. Bear mind, there zero cost to signing a cert ...