[dragonwriter]

> It's worth noting that both the President of the US and the FCC Chairman have not taken a side in this

The FCC Chairman -- as part of the 3-2 majority of the commission that keeps adopting pro-neutrality regulations -- has taken a pro-neutrality side repeatedly. The current anger from some neutrality proponents is that the particular approach the majority of the commission has taken to rescue some neutrality provisions from the most recent court decision isn't the mechanism that those proponents prefer (for those that actually are objecting based on the real legal situation) or doesn't just reinstate what the court struck down (for those that are reacting to the content without considering the context).

The former is a real and meaningful objection -- but its simply not the case that the FCC Chair hasn't taken a side.