|
|
|
|
|
by spenrose
4353 days ago
|
|
The interweaving of complex shifting regulations with the economics of $B plants that take decades to build and involve tremendous amounts of radiation and energy is not some random coincidence, nor is the absence of Buffets and Icahns lining up to make a killing on the erstwhile Future of Clean Energy (as opposed to wind and solar). If thorium can't solve the political economy problems, then thorium is dead. A small loud group of techies yelling "don't you get it?!" and upvoting thorium posts on HN is just part of the ??? between underpants and the profit we will never see. |
|
Aside from that, nuclear reactors don't necessarily have to be gigawatt-size. Even in the U.S., smaller reactors are starting to make some regulatory headway.
But even conventional 1GW reactors don't have to take decades to build. China's first AP-1000s at Sanmen are being finished up this year and next for a construction time of five years.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanmen_Nuclear_Power_Plant
http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN-First-Haiyang-AP1000-ta...