|
|
|
|
|
by icebraining
4350 days ago
|
|
A company which hold patents without implementing them is basically not following the spirit of the law. Playing Devil's advocate, what about a company like ARM, which designs and patents new CPU designs and then licenses them to others? We can't claim their patents aren't implemented. Should they be forced to make the CPUs themselves? And if not, what would prevent NPEs from licensing to one small company and then suing everyone else? |
|
Actually you raise a good point. ARM has been always doing that though, they built their own cpus when they started, iirc. That would have large consequences on their current business model, it's true.
> And if not, what would prevent NPEs from licensing to one small company and then suing everyone else?
It's already happening. When one of those company win a lawsuit, it is usually followed by them selling a license to whomever they sued...
Which is the lesser evil? Forcing patent holders into producing practical implementation of their patents, or allowing NPEs to exist?
I guess my idea doesn't really hold waters. Most probably smarter people already have thought about that possibility and saw the issues you hinted at. Oh well.