|
|
|
|
|
by mordocai
4351 days ago
|
|
Playing devil's advocate: If someone "steals" your identity, it isn't really theft sure. Really, you both have a pointer to that identity. The problem, which makes it a good idea for it to be illegal, is that you both have a pointer to the EXACT SAME identity. Thus, any destructive(or benevolent) changes they make affect your identity as well. Contrast this with most forms of "copyright theft", where the original owner still has the original AND any changes you make to your copy have no effect on the original. |
|
Suppose you write a book report for school and another student copies yours and passes their copy in first. You still have your original but it is significantly devalued. Passing it in may actually have negative value as you maybe accused of cheating.
It may not be theft but I think it hard to argue that it is not taking something of value without permission.