|
|
|
|
|
|
by icebraining
4358 days ago
|
|
|
It may be false, but I don't see why would it be "obviously dumb". 2005 was nine years and a few governments ago; enough time for policies to change. After all, just eight years before that, the current PM, who was also the PM back then, presented a plan that included annexation of most settlements. I'm not saying the theory is correct, again, I have no idea, but that argument seems weak. |
|
|