|
|
|
|
|
by siganakis
4358 days ago
|
|
From my reading of the getting started guide, it looks like it treats your "working" directory as a git repository, with each run basically doing a commit & push. This means that your data (in files) needs to be in the working directory, and is versioned along side your code. Sounds pretty cool, but I am not sure how it would scale for large / constantly changing data sets. |
|
If your code pulls data from a database (e.g., kelv's test cases), one option is to save the DB snapshot out to a file when the code runs. After we finish executing your code, we snapshot all the new/changed files in your working directory (we call those the "results" of the run). Using this approach, you'd have a record of the DB snapshot for each run of your tests. But, again... if your snapshot is more than 10s of GB, the network transfer time could get annoying.
[0] We treat the working directory as a git repo, but since git breaks down with large files, we only use it to track your directory structure; we store actual file contents elsewhere.