|
|
|
|
|
|
by Ixiaus
4359 days ago
|
|
|
I didn't write that sentence very well if that's how it was interpreted, sorry. I meant to say that the abstractions available to Haskell are more powerful. I can't really think of any abstraction that's not available to it - even an Object System is possible in Haskell, it just wouldn't be as easy to use as Monads are. |
|
|
Dependent typing doesn't work very well in Haskell (yet).