[PyErr_SetString]

"I know it is cross platform, but the focus of the eco-system in very much on Windows."

There's a funny thing about its cross-platform nature: You almost never see C# apps on other platforms. Why is that? There must be thousands of useful C#/.Net applications made that other platforms could benefit from, but the ONLY ones I've seen are the ones that targeted Mono to begin with. Nothing else.

Something fishy is going on here.

[rsynnott]

> There's a funny thing about its cross-platform nature: You almost never see C# apps on other platforms. Why is that? There must be thousands of useful C#/.Net applications made that other platforms could benefit from

I'm not sure that that's actually the case. C# has never caught on in a big way for consumer desktop development; the bulk of that still seems to be C++ and Win32/Win32 wrapper. It's used for _enterprise_ desktop development, of course, but people are less excited about porting that.

[PyErr_SetString]

Yeah, that could explain it. Sort of like how you rarely see Java client applications...

[arethuza]

Eclipse, PyCharm?

[monkeyprojects]

I think its simple. Unless the person is interested in Mono they don't develop for it and don't have any interest in supporting it.

Many people use C# to develop applications for Windows and don't, won't or can't support other environments....

And while there are thousand of useful C# programs I doubt many don't have direct python / Linux competitors readily available that do near enough the same thing.

[thomasz]

Two reasons:

a) I can't imagine somebody bothering to support .net software on the Linux desktop without being paid for it. I know those guys[1] are a minority, but it takes only a minority to create an absolutely toxic atmosphere. Maintaining a end user product can lead to frustrating interactions, and it doesn't really help if your choice of technology means that there exists a significant number of people who literally want you, your spouse, your three year old daughter and the family dog to die in a fucking fire.

b) Mono was always a bad choice for asp.net, which means that the software people are actually paid for doesn't run well on Linux. That was mostly a problem outside of xamarins control, and I hope it becomes better not that the devdiv MS seems to be somewhat committed to work together to make it truly interoperable.

[1] Just look at the comments at http://techrights.org/2013/02/09/tombye/.

[PyErr_SetString]

"I think its simple. Unless the person is interested in Mono they don't develop for it and don't have any interest in supporting it."

But why wouldn't someone who IS interested in running the application on Linux simply do the last bits to get it to other platforms? I have NEVER seen that happen.

"And while there are thousand of useful C# programs I doubt many don't have direct python / Linux competitors readily available that do near enough the same thing."

Sure, but I refuse to believe all the competitors are always doing a better job. There should be at least some application that found their way over to for example Linux.

[arethuza]

What about Xamarin though:

https://xamarin.com/

I've been kind of avoiding mobile development after getting my fingers slightly singed by spending too much time with jQuery Mobile before giving up - the one thing that tempts me to try doing some mobile development is the Xamarin tool set.