|
|
|
|
|
|
by Kudos
4359 days ago
|
|
|
> LTR doesn't imply ranking because we read from left to right (IMHO). When we name our company you won't mind if we put my name first then. > FYI, the highest score in a football match is 149:0 I don't think non-televised protest matches matter. The EPL (probably the most watched league in the world) has literally never produced a double digit scoring match (that's approx. 7980 matches). > And even during a world cup double-digits can be reached quite easily when the game is decided by penalty shootout. You're not arguing from knowledge at all, you're just googling shit to be contrary. You don't add the goals from the penalty shootout to the total, they are a separate scoreline. |
|
|
That's an old problem really. Somebody has to go first. Home team over away team, alphabetical order, etc. I think we've solved that problem.
Of course 149:0 isn't representative. Just because it hasn't happened doesn't mean it won't though. The point is you do have to worry about edge cases. Take the ball possession graphic for example: Picture what that might look like for a color blind person. Not all that helpful.
I know they currently keep two different score boards but I'm not sure that has to be that way (could be though - I don't know). The site I use to check the scores merges them after the game but the FIFA website doesn't.
I'm not trying to be contrary btw, and I'm not sure why you're offended. I said I really like the design, but I do think they removed a lot of flexibility and clarity for no reason by changing most of the layout without putting all that much thought into why things look the way the currently look.
I may not know a lot about football but I do know a lot about design. I didn't even talk about the clock which looks gorgeous but (as others already pointed out) doesn't work that well.