...and how has that backed up anything you have said?
I already know Schwarz killed himself. I already know the prosecutor was zealous.
So, either post the aggregated data that shows accused parties kill themselves prior to trial or simply STFU. I am not joking it really is embarrassing for you.
> So, either post the aggregated data that shows accused parties kill themselves prior to trial or simply STFU.
Is that how debate works, you posit a random ultimatum or else discussion over. Interesting, explains a lot though.
Schwartz and James, both killed themselves while under prosecution. James specifically called out the prosecution (and his impending conviction) as the reason for his suicide (in a suicide note).
An honest question, do you think it just random chance that two people facing similar charges by the same prosecutor both killed themselves?
Well that was actually in the other thread, this one I just said you lacked empathy to understand the situation, I've now pointed out someone in exactly the same position made exactly the same choice. So even if you lack empathy, you can understand it just from a logical point of view: "Hmm, pressure from prosecutors can make people kill themselves. Interesting phenomena".
Back to the "normal" arguement: I've posted that in the context of a prosecution that was handing down a sizable sentence (Probably not as high as 35) but not as low as 6 months (which is what you said), Suicide is a fairly understandable outcome. I gave you the links in wikipedia, and showed you two cases where it happened.
Posting a link to a story from the Daily Mail is the argumentative equivalent of shooting yourself in the face.
Widely regarded as the worst newspaper in the United Kingdom. Please don't respond. You are seriously embarrassing yourself.