|
|
|
|
|
by Alupis
4376 days ago
|
|
It's quite clear what happened. GS told us. A GS employee emailed sensitive data to a gmail account... and now GS wants Google to go in and delete an email from a private user's account without their permission (and possibly without their knowledge). There is nothing to "track". GS screwed up... now wants Google to "save the day". Given by the press around this, and the likelyhood the gmail account owner noticed the email, we can assume the data is already in the open... so retroactively deleting it accomplishes nothing. GS needs to start informing their customers about their data loss and possible outcomes. |
|
>There is nothing to "track".
From the article: Goldman (GS.N) [...] wants Google's (GOOGL.O) help in tracking down who might have accessed the data.
>from a private user's account without their permission
I think you're focusing too much on technical details. An email sitting on the server unread is effectively still undelivered. GS wants to cancel delivery. I see that as fair and not intrusive.
>the likelyhood the gmail account owner noticed the email
It might not have even been an active account.
>we can assume the data is already in the open.
Why in the world should that be assumed instead of checked?