|
|
|
|
|
by doragcoder
4368 days ago
|
|
I agree. I don't see where this is significantly better. You can add data to signed certs as well, so you can get the SIN functionality that way if I'm not mistaken. I also didn't see if this touched the blockchain at all. They made note about the SIN being public (then again, so is a Public Key), so I'm looking for the SIN to be in a blockchain somewhere. |
|
I discussed it with a govt architect who wanted to get rid of the "bloody database at centre of every application that thinks it needs to store citizens data"
It's a powerful idea