|
|
|
|
|
by tim333
4364 days ago
|
|
It depends a bit how you define things. The Copenhagen interpretation has a collapsing wave function doing so in a way where we can't observe it collapse and the pilot wave theory has pilot waves all over the place that have no effect other than guiding the particle in question then effectively disappearing when not needed. If either the collapses or pilot waves were real things I would kind of expect them to be observable in some way, but in both interpretations they are not observable, which leads me to suspect they are not real things and will go the way of the "luminiferous aether". |
|
To be charitable to Copenhagen, we would say that we do see the results of collapse. The main problem with the collapse is that is simply not well-specified by the theory.