Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by JasonFruit 4373 days ago
Because it takes from a few people and gives to many. More people would vote for it than not.
1 comments

Ah, Robin Hood democracy. Of course villagers would vote to take away from the king and give to themselves. It all depends on the perspective - if a regular Joe Smith realized that his child will not be able to keep his house because they would never afford to pay 85% of its value in tax, they might not vote for such a law.
Mere details. Certainly one could devise a tax code complex enough that Joe Smith couldn't hope to judge its effect on him.