[firstOrder]

> In a country with little or no place to gather for the free expression of ideas and no place to talk politics without fear of repression

Edward Snowden revealed that the USA was monitoring its citizens and storing that data in a way that far outstrips anything the KGB was ever capable of. Should he fear repression? He should, the government wants to lock him up and throw away the key for revealing this, just like they did to Manning for what he revealed. Actually, NPR spends most of its time bashing Snowden.

They seem gaga for dissidence in some foreign country, in a government that hasn't existed for over two decades though.

[mseebach]

Without defending the NSA excesses, the difference is in the repression, not the monitoring. There is little evidence that the NSA monitoring was used for repression of citizens, and even less evidence of the sort of repression that was rampant in the Soviet bloc.

[olifante]

nice blindfolds you have there. Guantanamo Bay, Abu Ghraib, the largest prison population by far among rich countries, institutionalized rape, drone executions without a shred of legal process, militarized police and you're still making excuses for what was not so long ago the beacon of modern civilization and democracy.

[p1esk]

Now compare things you mentioned with a social climate where the entire country is one big prison, North Korea style.

Can't imagine life like that? Yeah, I thought so.

[Zigurd]

Do you think that people who want fundamental change in the US are not harassed and repressed, and their activities criminalized?

[Macsenour]

I don't feel repressed in any way and I have the freedom of speech, by law, that repressed people do not. Comparing those two is an insult to those that lived in the Soviet era.

[Zigurd]

You are advocating for fundamental change in America? Or just some tax cuts?

Mostly, things are under control here: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/princeton-scholar-demise-of-...

[mseebach]

Did you seriously just link to an interview in very popular, US-hosted website with a US-based (presumably tenured) professor at one of the best universities in the world (did I mention US based?) in which he lays out in great detail his public academic research on how he considers the US an oligarchy -- as evidence of repression and harassment of those advocating for fundamental change?

Do you understand the words repression and harassment? Do you understand that if he had ventured into such research (much less published it, much much less been interviewed about it in a publication), he (and his wife) would at best have lost their jobs. Probably reassigned a new flat of the sort described in the article, in a remote area (docile academics often enjoyed access to privileged accommodation). Worst case, re-education in a Gulag.

The fact that the US isn't by a long shot perfect doesn't make it Soviet Russia.

[Zigurd]

> ...doesn't make it Soviet Russia.

High standards.

[vvpan]

NPR bashing Snowden? Don't listen to it, but I'm very surprised.

[electronous]

> just like they did to Manning for what he revealed.

She, not he

[Dylan16807]

'he' at the time, dysphoria nonwithstanding.

[electronous]

That's not how it works, bigot

[Dylan16807]

Referring to someone's past actions using their preferred pronouns at the time of those actions is bigotry? Gosh, better inform all those contemporary news articles that they're retroactively disrespectful.