Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by digz 4376 days ago
Reaching consumers is hard, even if you have the superior product. Facilitating such a transaction should make one proud.

The 'psychological exploits' are a marginal component, but again, why is it inherently bad for someone to feel good about using product x over product y, even if they're exactly the same?

2 comments

Reaching consumers is hard, even if you have the superior product. Facilitating such a transaction should make one proud.

It's entirely an accident if an advertizing service facilitates that transaction. They're not consumer reports, they're boosters for whoever pays.

Are you suggesting that advertising never influences people to make choices that are not in their best interests?