[cowbell]

http://vimeo.com/96639840

Start at 26mins. You don't have flip. You lose control over partial application. It isn't curry. You're right. It is an important distinction :)

[CrossEye]

I finally got a chance to watch that video, and it looks as though what you're worried about is `flip`. Ramda for one already includes a version that works much like Haskell's. I don't know if this satisfies your objection, though.

[tel]

As I stated above... flip is well defined so long as your arguments are positional.

[comex]

This implementation of multi-argument partial application does not in any say prevent implementation of flip. It's just syntax sugar.