|
|
|
|
|
|
by scarmig
4381 days ago
|
|
|
Do you have an example of this in mind? Thinking of colonizers... South Africa had much more land for the conquered, even during apartheid. Israel has set aside massive amounts of land to its previous inhabitants. Canada certainly has much more land set aside, though I expect it's equally marginal. More generally... Japan-SK Japan-Taiwan UK-India Overall it seems rare for conquerers to commit a genocide and set aside marginal lands for the previous inhabitants. Usually it makes more economic sense to take the existing population and use political violence to extract labor and resources out of them. |
|
|