[DannyBee]

This is not how it was introduced, the blog post was the introduction. We published earlier research papers because we publish papers.

The plan was always the same.

Before this, the project wasn't really real, it was just research.

If you consider this "public messaging", then I guess google should never release research papers or research SDK's without fear of being raked over the coals?

If so, that's a sad state of affairs.

[cliffbean]

You're right that the first link I posted is a research paper, and that it should be interpreted accordingly. It is interesting though that in the paper, they compare NaCl to other systems, some of which include ISA virtualization, and they specifically say "we made a deliberate choice against virtualization". And this paper is just a small sample of what Google was saying about NaCl in 2009. But you're right, it is still a research project at that point.

However, you apparently missed the second link I posted, which is in fact a blog post and an introduction. NaCl is no longer a research project there. In fact, the post itself specifically describes the difference between research releases and the release it is announcing.

[tptacek]

They held the sandbox breaking contest (our team came in second!) in 2009. You're suggesting they announced in 2011, right?

[DannyBee]

I'm suggesting in 2009, it was random cool research (I actually can't even remember whether it was being funded by chrome back then), not something with a real and true plan to become what it is now.

That really didn't happen until late 2010 or 2011, AFAIK.

[tptacek]

I think I could debate this point with you, but I just clicked up the thread to see the context (I only found this subthread because I follow your comments) and can now see why we wouldn't want to perpetuate this subthread.

Your original point, that Portable Nacl is within the original charter of the Nacl project, was valid, even if we can quibble about the timelines. :)