[TazeTSchnitzel]

Mozilla are still working on Firefox performance and are not just "copying Chrome"; I prefer FF's look to Chrome's.

Also, Mozilla are playing a smart game with FF OS. They are not selling to the high-end or even mid-end markets. They are selling it as a modern OS with much lower requirements than Android for low-end budget phones. This is a niche nobody else targets any more. It forces them to improve performance and memory usage, too.

[thejdude]

I totally agree. IMHO: Firefox's new look is better than Chrome, and its feel has always been better. I try out Chrome every year or so, but it seems like Mozilla pays more attention to detail in their GUI design than Google.

On Android, it's also my browser of choice - fast and smooth, and it gives me the option to block third-party cookies (been surfing the web w/o them for 15 years - but no, mobile Chrome cannot allow that; we need more adver-tracking!).

While I'm a very big fan of native, optimized code (that is: C), I think FF OS has an advantage concerning memory use, because the browser and the rest of the OS share the runtime, unlike an Android phone. It also makes it easier for low-budget developers to write apps, because they don't need (a machine that can handle) an SDK, just a browser.